<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ironpaper: Current &#187; law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ironpaper.com/current/tag/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ironpaper.com/current</link>
	<description>Industry News and Topics of Interest.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:10:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Craiglist Has Blocked Access To &#8220;Adult Services&#8221; Section</title>
		<link>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/09/craiglist-has-blocked-access-to-adult-services-section/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/09/craiglist-has-blocked-access-to-adult-services-section/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironpaper.com/current/?p=1285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facing pressure from human rights groups, law enforcement and other groups that feel Craigslist&#8217;s adult services section contributes to human trafficking, the classified ads website has blocked access to the &#8220;adult services&#8221; section. It is unclear whether Craigslist plans to permanently close this section of the website or if this is, as the NY Times [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/09/craiglist-has-blocked-access-to-adult-services-section/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Controversial internet regulation proposal by Google and Verizon</title>
		<link>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/08/controversial-internet-regulation-proposal-by-google-and-verizon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/08/controversial-internet-regulation-proposal-by-google-and-verizon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironpaper.com/current/?p=1249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google and Verizon jointly created a proposal that outlines how they believe the internet should be regulated. The plan is not aligned with the tenets of Net Neutrality and has been widely criticized by proponents of a &#8220;free and democratic&#8221; web. The proposal does not state that Internet Service Providers should be able to block [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/08/controversial-internet-regulation-proposal-by-google-and-verizon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. District Judge Of NY Says Google Did Not Violate Viacom&#8217;s Copyrights</title>
		<link>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/06/u-s-district-judge-of-ny-says-google-did-not-violate-viacoms-copyrights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/06/u-s-district-judge-of-ny-says-google-did-not-violate-viacoms-copyrights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironpaper.com/current/?p=1125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Judge of New York ruled in favor of Google (in the case Viacom vs. YouTube), saying that YouTube wasn’t liable for infringement upon Viacom&#8217;s copyrights after clips of MTV and Comedy Central circulated the video site. Viacom raised the complaint in April of 2008 and sought a minimum of $1 billion in damages. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/06/u-s-district-judge-of-ny-says-google-did-not-violate-viacoms-copyrights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon&#8217;s Social Network Patent</title>
		<link>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/06/amazons-social-network-patent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/06/amazons-social-network-patent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironpaper.com/current/?p=1103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would seem that Facebook would need to hault it&#8217;s operations based on a newly awarded patent by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to Amazon. The patent generally outlines a text-book description of the type of &#8220;social network&#8221; that Facebook and so many other companies have build businesses upon. The synopsis outlines a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/06/amazons-social-network-patent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Many Countries Consider Suing Google For Wifi Data Collection From Street View Project</title>
		<link>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/06/many-countries-consider-suing-google-for-wifi-data-collection-from-street-view-project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/06/many-countries-consider-suing-google-for-wifi-data-collection-from-street-view-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironpaper.com/current/?p=1065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many as 30 countries may be suing Google for data collection taken during the Street View project from unsecured (Wifi) hotspots. The countries investigating Google&#8217;s actions include the United States, many countries in Europe and in Asia. Google has publicly responded to the investigations, saying that they believe that they have not done anything [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/06/many-countries-consider-suing-google-for-wifi-data-collection-from-street-view-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Blocks Foursquare After Users Check Into Tiananmen Square On It&#8217;s 21st Anniversary</title>
		<link>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/06/china-blocks-foursquare-after-users-check-tiananmen-square-on-21st-anniversary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/06/china-blocks-foursquare-after-users-check-tiananmen-square-on-21st-anniversary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 14:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironpaper.com/current/?p=1030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chinese Government decided to block the mobile app service Fourquare after users &#8220;check in&#8221; to  on the 21st anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. Although Fourquare is new and small compared to the giant web service, Facebook, this event shows a very interesting usage of the web application as a protest vehicle. During the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/06/china-blocks-foursquare-after-users-check-tiananmen-square-on-21st-anniversary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pakistan Ends Ban On Facebook Following Apology</title>
		<link>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/05/pakistan-ends-ban-on-facebook-following-apology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/05/pakistan-ends-ban-on-facebook-following-apology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 17:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironpaper.com/current/?p=1009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook apologized for and removed offensive content from it&#8217;s site, which prompted Pakistan to end a ban against the website. The offensive content was a contest on Facebook for a contest that requested for caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad. Facebook promised that the content would not be seen again in Pakistan on the social networking [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/05/pakistan-ends-ban-on-facebook-following-apology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Facing Class Action Suite in Oregon and Washington State Over Data Collection For Online Maps</title>
		<link>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/05/google-facing-class-action-suite-in-oregon-and-washington-state-over-data-collection-for-online-maps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/05/google-facing-class-action-suite-in-oregon-and-washington-state-over-data-collection-for-online-maps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 22:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironpaper.com/current/?p=994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is facing class action lawsuits in Oregon and Washington states over privacy concerns relating &#8220;street view&#8221; data collection for it&#8217;s online mapping program. The plaintiffs, Vicki Van Valin and Neil Mertz, say that their privacy was violated by the camera strapped cars that Google uses to photograph for the street view of it&#8217;s online [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/05/google-facing-class-action-suite-in-oregon-and-washington-state-over-data-collection-for-online-maps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Potential Antitrust Case Against Apple For Programming Tools Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/05/potential-antitrust-case-against-apple-for-programming-tools-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/05/potential-antitrust-case-against-apple-for-programming-tools-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironpaper.com/current/?p=957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice are considering launching an anti-trust case against Apple following Apple&#8217;s ban on non-Apple-sanctioned development tools as specified in their new TOS agreement. The case would focus on the new TOS (Terms of service agreement) for iPhone OS4, which dictates which development tools a programmer may [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/05/potential-antitrust-case-against-apple-for-programming-tools-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giant Digital Library Faces Set Backs As Google Is Sued</title>
		<link>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/04/giant-digital-library-faces-set-backs-as-google-is-sued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/04/giant-digital-library-faces-set-backs-as-google-is-sued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/04/giant-digital-library-faces-set-backs-as-google-is-sued/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Authors Guild, the Association of American Publishers and Google are going to settle the landmark settlement of Authors Guild v. Google. March 31, 2011 will be the deadline for authors to claim their books and inserts to be eligible for cash payments for their digitization. On the back of this settlement announcement, Google is to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ironpaper.com/current/2010/04/giant-digital-library-faces-set-backs-as-google-is-sued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
