Ironpaper Webintel: Knowledge base for internet business and web development.
Topic:

content management

Link building basics for SEO

Wednesday, December 22nd, 2010

Link building is an essential part of SEO, but many businesses try to find the quick and easy approach, which can often cause more harm than good. Google believes that both content and link building should be focused on quality, relevancy and good usability. The practice of SEO unfortunately, as of late, is becoming associated with SPAM and auto-generated, garbage content that many business owners mistake for building visibility online. The easy answer and the quick fix are not part of the search engine optimization equation. The practice of SEO takes time and effort. For a quick result, PPC (Pay Per Click) advertising is a good search engine solution--as the results can be instantaneous.

We feel that SEO is both an art and a science. Ultimately, our approach is focused on business development and optimization, not just trying to rank high for a specific keyphrase. Our approach to SEO is a fairly holistic practice--one that considers page optimization, transactions and content improvements over time, as well as, building better search ranking.

For business owners or website owners just looking for an introduction to link building, the following information should give you some pointers and context. This quick intro assumes that the reader already understands some of the basics of search engines, Page Rank and search algorithms.

No Follow Links, rel="nofollow"
As we believe that content and links should be focused on the concept of quality, we should start with "no follow" links. The no follow attribute is a parameter that tells Google a link is an advertisement and to not pass Page Rank to the destination URL. This attribute is great for blogs and news websites, which might otherwise get penalized for linking to an assortment of not topically relevant websites and web pages. Obviously, ads in many cases need to link somewhere, but external linking can reflect in both a neutral/positive way or possibly a negative way. Some instances where a webmaster would wish to employ no follow links might include: 1. Paid links 2. controlling the prioritization of robots crawling your site content or 3. untrusted sources (content or websites) and 4. user generated content like comments or publicly posted event submissions.  (SOURCE: Google, http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=96569 )

Directories, are they worth it?
Well, it depends. You should avoid link farms entirely. Simply don't waste your time submitting your website to crappy, over saturated directories, but there are a lot of great directories out there that can be quite useful to users. Directories should be useful to a real, human user. For some businessses, being listed in a directory can actually help that business develop leads to customer and b to b relationships. This is valuable. But try to keep your advertising relevant to directories of the right niche or topic. You can also check the ROI of your directory or ad listing by creating a tracking URL by adding "?=trackmyad" to the end of your URL. Simply add the "?" followed by a custom message of your deciding and you can easily filter and measure the performance of that listing within your Analytics system. Some directories, however, may not be as helpful. Super spammy directories may be discounted from your incoming link values or simply get you a ton of SPAM submissions from your content form. Not super helpful for a business looking to build real customer relationships.

Not very helpful: Tons of low quality or low Page Rank links
Google has warned website owners that sites can be penalized or looked upon suspiciously if they generate tons of low quality links in a short amount of time. Some SEO companies actually offer this service / product, which may end up doing more harm than good. First of all, Google may not even count many of these links, so it could be a waste of effort. You can get a lot more value from a single quality, strong website than an army of links from poor quality websites. Again, an easy to understand rule for SEO is: make it useful for real people. If a penalty were to occur for a website based on incoming poor quality links, a new website would be at a greater risk than an established website with a history of quality content under their belt.

Relevancy is truly valuable
Google places a strong value on relevancy, but so do searchers. The whole point of a search engine is to find content that is relevant to the user. If your site is not relevant or helpful, the user will quickly bounce away. Studying bounce rates in your analytics tool is a great way to improve the overall performance of your website. By studying and trying to improve bounce rates for specific content pages, you can better understand what your visitors are looking for and how to better engage them. Sometimes, a visitor will bounce away not because of the content, but rather the presentation of that content. You can perform experiments and tests to gain better retention by improving the content structure of your site and improving the initial impression of a page through design and page layout. Make the page cleaner, easier to read and prettier!

Contribute to the community
One great way to build quality links and recommendations that mean something is to actually contribute to your specific  niche community of blogs, forums, social websites, websites and press. Forget link sharing. Try actually responding to articles in blogs and begin to development conversations with other bloggers. Interact with interesting pros in your field using Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn, which will help you both promote your services/products indirectly and become known as a respected and valuable member of that topical community. People actually do link to content that is useful and helpful. Also, you can build a lot of quality traffic from social media by carrying conversations that are topic focused--rather than being a direct sell of your services.

Sources:

  1. Google Webmaster Central
  2. Search Engine Land
  3. Bing Toolbox for webmasters & Blog

One Ad Per Search Query For Affiliate Advertisers For Top Level Domain

Friday, May 28th, 2010

Google has a rule which restricts affiliate marketers to one search query spot for each top level (display) domain. This has implications for affiliate advertisers that run their content on a shared or large website where other affiliate advertisers may be present.

Google will determine that these websites will be the same and will only permit one query spot for these addresses:

  • proper.ironpaper.com
  • www.ironpaper.com
  • ironpaper.com
  • www.ironpaper.com/webdesign
  • www.Ironpaper.com

However, these domains are not equivalent in Google's "eyes:"

  • example.com
  • example.ca

Another rule that affiliate advertisers should abide by is that your website should not mirror or duplicate another website. Google will not show ads for identical websites. Their goal is to provide unique and useful content to users and they view such duplicate material as not useful.

By the way: If there are two duplicate websites, but one of those websites ranks higher with Ad Rank, the higher ranking site will most certainly win the contest. This rule assumes that the two website landing pages are not violating other rules for affiliate ads or regular search ranking that would cause penalties.

In essence, even affiliate advertising requires unique content for the contest of organic search query results.

Content Management For Small Businesses: Does My Business Need A CMS?

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

Many small businesses facing the decision of building a website come across the question of content management. In essence, the business managers need to balance short term costs and long-term usage of a website. Many business managers find themselves asking: "Should I spend more initially and add the right content management system to power our site? Or should I just get something out there and try to add it later?" The question is not always simple. For one, many business owners make the decision of upgrading their online presence too later or long after it is needed. Then after deciding to move forward on the project, the business managers feel pressure to get something out there ... and quick. The details can often feel complicated and detached from the real world needs of the business.

For one, we feel that every business has unique needs... just as each business has a unique story and motive that drive it. Some businesses thrive with little overhead, while others are burdened with short staffing, lack of infrastructure and out-moded technology. So, when a company find themselves having to make decisions about an investment in web technology and a website, we figured it could be helpful to have a set of questions to ask and seek answers for.

Do I need a content management system?
If your company plans on making frequent or  semi frequent updates to content or would like to more closely tie in marketing activities to the web, a content management system will be essential. Even having a webmaster on staff can cause delays with the gap between content decisions (editors and writers) and the publisher (web master). Updating and styling HTML can take time--especially when the request pile in... even an inhouse webmaster can get overwhelmed when making routine content updates. A CMS can simply allow for faster publishing and a better response to marketing initiatives. Website visitors for instance will be far less inclined to visit a website that is static and does not have frequent updates. Search engines also crave websites that are frequently updated--thus awarding them higher ratings and better positioning within their rankings.

What are the costs for owning and running a CMS?
The upfront and licensing costs for a CMS will vary from vendor to vendor--and depend on a large number of factors. Many small businesses feel compelled to go with an open source option, because there are many free software packages for content management available on the market. Joomla, Drupal and WordPress are just a few options available, and they are feature rich. Just because they are free and have a heaps of features does not necessarily mean that they are right for your company. There are other factors to consider, such as security, implementation costs, load time, update costs, maintenance costs, scalability and modularity. Free open source technologies can have hidden costs and long term challenges that may not be an immediate consideration in the planning phase of a web project. It can be a good idea to consider a couple options  and take a close look at your needs and capabilities. Below are a list of costs involved with content management systems:

  • Licensing
  • Implementation
  • Modules
  • Maintenance
  • Support, training and consultation
  • Upgrading
  • Migrating

All of these types of costs can be charged as either a one time fee or as ongoing payments --depending on the vendor, software company or product. It is important to consider the costs beyond the initial implementation of the CMS.

Is it possible to have a hybrid system: one part open source and another part custom?
Yes, it is. Open source systems like WordPress can be modified and adapted towards a broad range of uses. For web designers, there can be a lot of fun in trying to figure out new approaches to adapting open source frameworks and platforms. For instance, Ironpaper has a few proprietary content management systems that we take a lot of pride in. Our CMS can integrate with WordPress and share data across the platform divide, which a number of our clients have really enjoyed. Even open source support communities themselves have long tinkered with hybrid integrations between different products--just take a look at the vast array of extensions, components and add-ons to a product like Joomla for instance. Content management design and development is a very creative process that can go a long way to building strong brands and better businesses.